Mata kuliah Teori Hubungan Internasional Post-Positivis mempelajari paradigma pemikiran kritis dalam studi hubungan internasional. Mahasiswa akan memahami paradigma post-positivisme dalam hubungan internasional, seperti Critical Theory, Marxism, Feminism, Green Politics, Postmodernism, Postcolonialism. Constructivism, dan Non-western International Relations Theories. Dengan mempelajari mata kuliah ini, mahasiswa akan mampu, baik secara mandiri maupun berkelompok dalam mengidentifikasi isu, aktor dan dinamika hubungan internasional, serta mampu menganalisis realitas global dengan pendekatan Teori Hubungan Internasional Post-Positivis
Scott Burchill. 2005. Theories of International Relations, 3rd Ed, (New York; Palgrave MacMillan)
Brian C. Schmidt. 2002. Handbook of Internasional Relations, (London; Sage Publication)
C.W. Kegley & G.A. Raymond, The Global Future; A Brief Introduction to World Politics, 3rd Ed, Wadsworth, Boston, 2010.
Barry Buzan. 1983. People, State and Fear; The National Security Problem in International Relations. (Wheatsheaf Books)
Barry Buzan & Ole Waver. 2003. Regions and Power; The Structure of International Security. (Cambridge Univ Press)
Emanuel Adler. 1998. Security Communities. (Cambridge Univ Press)
Shaummil Hadi, Third Debate dan Kritik Positivisme Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Yogyakarta; Jalasutra, 2008
Wendt, Alexander. 2003. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press, Virtual Publishing.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy is What States make of it; The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, Vol.46 No.2, pp.391-425
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory, International Organization, Vol.41 No.3, pp.335-370
Hurrel, A and B. Kingsburry. 1992. The International Politics of the Environment. Oxford University Press.
Cox, Robert. 1986. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders’ in Keohane R. (ed.). Neo-Realisme and Its Critics. Princeton University Press.
Der Derian, J. and Saphiro, M. 1989. International / Intertextual Relations; Postmodern Reading of World Politics. Lexington; MA. Lexington books
Goodin, RE. 1992. Green Political Theory. Cambridge University Press
Guzzini, Stefano and Anna Leander. 2006. Constructivism and International Relations; Alexander Wendt and his Critics. Routledge; New York.
Amitav Acharya & Barry Buzan. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory; Perspective on and Beyond Asia. (London and New York; Routledge)
J. Fox & S. Sandler. 2004. Bringing Religion into International Relations. (New York; Palgrave Macmillan)
R. Ashley & RBJ Walker, Speaking the Language of Exile; Dissidence in International Studies http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-8833%28199009%2934%3A3%3C259%3AISTLOE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O
Steven C. Roach. 2008. Critical Theory and International Relations. (NY; Routledge)
Clyde W. Barrow. 1993. Critical Theories of the State; Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Post-Marxist. (London; Winconsin Press)
Nasaruddin Umar. 1999. Argumentasi Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Jakarta; Paramadina
Margot Badran. 2009. Feminism in Islam; Seculer and Religious Convergences. Oxford; One World
Akrum Helfaya, Amr Kotb, Rasha Hanafi. 2016. “Qur’anic Ethics for Environmetal Responsibility”. Journal of Business Ethics
A.A. Syarkawi, A. Abdullah, Norimah Dali. 2016. “The Concept of Sustainability from the Islamic Perspectives”. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law. Vol.9 Issue (5)
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism”. International Organization. Vol.58, No.2