Administrator

Admin

Terakhir diupdate:

April 8, 2025

Jumlah SKS:

3 SKS

Deskripsi Mata Kuliah

Mata kuliah Analisis Politik Luar Negeri membahas teori, konsep, dan metode dalam menganalisis kebijakan luar negeri suatu negara. Fokus utama mencakup faktor domestik dan internasional yang mempengaruhi keputusan diplomatik, strategi negosiasi, serta peran aktor negara dan non-negara dalam hubungan internasional. Mahasiswa akan mempelajari pendekatan analitis untuk memahami dinamika kebijakan luar negeri, termasuk studi kasus dari berbagai negara.

  • Pokok Bahasan / Bahan Kajian
    1. Pengantar Politik dan Kebijakan Luar Negeri
    2. Dasar-dasar Politik Luar Negeri serta Proses Pengambilan Kebijakan Luar Negeri
    3. Tools of Analysis dan Levels of Analysis: 1) pendekatan atau teori dalam HI, 2) individual LoA, 3) groups LoA, 4) sistem internasional, 5) budaya dan identitas nasional, 6) politik domestik 7) opini publik, 8) atribut nasional
    4. Pendekatan dan teori Hubungan Internasional dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    5. Individual LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    6. Group LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    7. Sistem internasional LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    8. Budaya dan identitas nasional LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    9. Politik domestik LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri dengan studi kasus politik, kepentingan nasional, dan posisi Indonesia
    10. Opini publik dan media LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    11. Atribut nasional LoA dalam analisis politik luar negeri
    12. Proses perubahan politik luar negeri
    13. Globalisasi dan politik luar negeri; diplomasi dan politik luar negeri
    14. Islam dan politik luar negeri 

  • Pustaka
    1. Rathbun, Brian C. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Toolbox. New York: Routledge, 2018.
    2. Carlsnaes, Walter (2013). “Foreign Policy”, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse & Beth A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, Sage, pp. 331-349.
    3. Hudson, Valerie M. (2014). Foreign Policy Analysis, Classic and Contemporary Theory, Rowman & Littlefield; 2nd Edition. Ch.1, pp. 3-35.
    4. Doyle, Michael W. (2012). “Liberalism and foreign policy” in, Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield & Tim Dunne, Foreign Policy, Theories . Actors . Cases. Oxford; pp. 54-77.
    5. Flockhart, Trine (2012). “Constructivism and foreign policy” in, Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield & Tim Dunne, Foreign Policy, Theories . Actors . Cases. Oxford; pp. 78-93.
    6. Hansen, Lene (2012). “Discourse analysis, post-structuralism, and foreign policy” in, Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield & Tim Dunne, Foreign Policy, Theories . Actors . Cases. Oxford; pp. 94-109.
    7. Singer, J. David (1961). “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations”, World Politics, 14(1); pp.77-92.
    8. Wohlforth, William C. (2012). “Realism and foreign policy” in, Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield & Tim Dunne, Foreign Policy, Theories . Actors . Cases. Oxford; pp. 35-53.
    9. Breuning, Marijke (2007). Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Ch.2-3 (Leaders).
    10. Neack, Laura (2008). The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Ch.2 & 3 (Individual LoA).
    11. Dyson, Stephen Benedict (2006). “Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(3); pp. 289-306.
    12. Hermann, Margaret G. (1980). “Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders”, International Studies Quarterly, 24(1); pp.7-46.
    13. Hudson, Valerie M. (1990). “Birth Order of World Leaders: An Exploratory Analysis of Effects on Personality and Behavior”, Political Psychology, 11(3); pp. 583-601.
    14. Post, Jerrold, ed. (2003). The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
    15. Schafer, Mark, Jonathan Nunley, and Scott Crichlow (2011). “Small Group Dynamics: The Psychological Characteristics of Leaders and the Quality of Group Decision Making”, in Walker, Stephen G., Akan Malici, & Mark Schafer, eds. (2011). Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioral International Relations. London: Routledge. Ch.7.
    16. Garrison, Jean (2007). “Constructing the “National Interest” in U.S.-China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(2); pp. 105-126.Maoz, Zeev (1990). “Framing the National Interest: The Manipulation of Foreign Policy Decisions in Group Settings”, World Politics, 43(1); pp. 77-110.
    17. Breuning, Marijke (2007). Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Ch.6 (Int’l Constraints).
    18. Alden, Chris & Amnon Aran (2012). Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Oxon: Routledge. Ch.5 (State and FP). Ch.6 (FP, Globalization, n FPA).
    19. Herman, Margaret G. & Hagan, Joe D. (1998). “International Decision Making: Leadership Matters”, Foreign Policy, (Spring); pp. 124-137.
    20. Keukeleire, Stephan & Simon Schunz (2015). “Analysing Foreign Policy in a Context of Global Governance”, in Hellman, Gunther & Knud Erik Jørgensen, eds. Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Ch.4.
    21. Waever, Ole (2002). “Identity, communities and foreign policy: Discourse analysis as foreign policy theory”, in L. Hansen & O. Waever (eds.), European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic states. London: Routledge. Ch.2.
    22. Bozdaglioglu, Yücel (2003). Turkish Foreign Policy and Turkish Identity: A Constructivist Approach. New York: Routledge. Ch.2 (Literature Review)
    23. Clunan, Anne L. (2009). The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Ch.1 & 2.
    24. Hudson, Valerie M. (1999). “Cultural Expectations of One’s Own and Other Nations’ Foreign Policy Action Templates”, Political Psychology, 20(4); pp. 767-801.
    25. Fearon, James D. (1998) “Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations”, Annual Review of Political Science, (1), pp. 289-313.
    26. Kaarbo, Juliet & Ryan K. Beasley (2008). “Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 4(1); pp. 67-81.
    27. King, Gary (1986). “Political Parties and Foreign Policy: A Structuralist Approach”, Political Psychology, 7(1); pp. 83-101.
    28. Gilboa, Eytan (2005) “Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect”, International Studies Perspectives, (6), pp. 325- 341.
    29. Naveh, Chanan. (2002) “The Role of the Media in Foreign Policy Decision- Making: A Theoretical Framework”, Conflict & Communication Online, 1(2), pp. 1-14.
    30. Robinson, Piers (2012). “The role of media and public opinion”, in, Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield & Tim Dunne, Foreign Policy, Theories . Actors . Cases. Oxford; pp. 168-187.
    31. Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli (2007). “Studying Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in International Crises: The United States and the Bosnian Crisis, 1992-1995”, The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(4); pp. 20-51.
    32. Risse-Kappen, Thomas. (1991). “Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies”, World Politics, Vol. 43 (4), pp. 479-512.
    33. Robinson, Piers (2002). The CNN Effect: The Myth of News, Foreign Policy, and Intervention. London: Routledge. Ch.1 (CNN Effect). Ch.2 (Theory of Media Influence)
    34. Lebovic, James (1985). “Capabilities in Context: National Attributes and Foreign Policy in the Middle East”, Journal of Peace Research, 22(1); pp. 47-67.
    35. East, Maurice A. (1973). “Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models”, World Politics, 25(4); pp. 556-576.
    36. Henrikson, Alan (2002). “Distance and Foreign Policy: a Political Geography Approach”, International Political Science Review, 23(4); pp. 437- 466.
    37. Shaohua, Hu (2015). “Small State Foreign Policy: The Diplomatic Recognition of Taiwan”, China: An International Journal, 13(2); pp. 1-23.
    38. Gustavsson, Jakob (1999). “How Should We Study Foreign Policy Change”, Cooperation and Conflict 34: pp. 73-95.
    39. Hermann, Charles (1990). “Changing Course: When Government Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy”, International Studies Quarterly, (34) 1; pp. 3-21
    40. Dugis, Vinsensio (2008). “Explaining Foreign Policy Change”, Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik, (21) 2; pp. 101-104.
    41. Goldmann, Kjell (1982). “Change and Stability in Foreign Policy: detente as a Problem of Stabilization”, World Politics, (34) 2; pp. 230-266.
    42. Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2003). The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Polity.
    43. Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2017). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.
    44. Naumescu, Valentin and Petruț, Diana (2022). FOREIGN POLICY AND DIPLOMACY: An Introduction, Second Edition. Romania: Presa Universitară Clujeană. ISBN: 978-606-37-1565-5
    45. Yungui, WU. (2011). “The Influence of Islam over the Foreign Policies of Contemporary Islamic Countries ”, Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), Vol. 5 (3), pp. 1-16
    46. Warner, Caroline M. & Stephen G. Walker (2011). “Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(1); pp. 113-135.

    1. Laptop
    2. Smart TV
    3. Microsoft Office

    dosen-analisis-politik-luar-negeri
    Rizki Rahmadini Nurika, S.Hub.Int., M.A.
    199003252018012001
    dosen-analisis-politik-luar-negeri
    Dhimas Rudy Hartanto, M.Han
    199812302025051006
    Preview
    • Koordinator :
      Dr. Abid Rohman, S. Ag., M. Pd.I
    • Dosen Pengajar :2
    • Durasi :1 Semester