Filsafat Kontemporer adalah mata kuliah yang mengkaji aliran-aliran pemikiran filsafat abad ke-19 hingga sekarang, beserta tokoh-tokoh utamanya. Fokus pembahasan meliputi arus besar seperti neo-thomisme, neo-hegelianisme, neo-positivisme, neo-pluralisme, post-strukturalisme hingga filsafat analitik dan filsafat kontinental. Mahasiswa diajak memahami konteks historis, gagasan pokok, serta relevansi pemikiran kontemporer dalam menghadapi persoalan ilmu pengetahuan, budaya, teknologi, dan kehidupan manusia modern. Mata kuliah ini menekankan kemampuan analisis kritis, dialogis, dan reflektif terhadap isu-isu filsafat mutakhir.
1. Memahami Dunia Kini Melalui Filsafat Kontemporer (Kuliah Pengantar)
2. Karakteristik dan Latar Historis Kelahiran Filsafat Kontemporer (Akhir Abad 19 - Awal Abad 20)
3. Dinamika Perkembangan Filsafat Kontemporer (Awal Abad 20 – Sekarang)
4. Filsafat Neo-Kantianisme
5. Filsafat Neo-Hegelianisme
6. Filsafat Neo-Thomisme
7. Filsafat Neo-Positivisme
8. Filsafat Analitik
9. Filsafat Kontinental
10. Filsafat Personalisme
11. Filsafat Neo-Marxisme
12. Filsafat Post-Strukturalisme
13. Filsafat Neo-Pragmatisme
14. Pemikiran Filsafat Slavoj Zizek dan Roy Bhaskar
1. Baert, Patrick. “Neo-Pragmatim and Phenomenology. A Proposal.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3, no. 2 (2011).
2. Banaji, Jairus. “Zizek’s Theory of Ideology.” Historical Materialism 18, no. 4 (2010): 69–78.
3. Bandara, D. “Post-Structuralism and Eastern Epistemology: the Concordance in Discordance.” Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities 40 (2014): 85.
4. Beaney, Michael. Analytic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
5. Beiser, Frederick C. Review of Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Rudolf A. Makkreel and Sebastian Luft. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, January 2012.
6. Bernasconi, Robert. “What Is Continental Philosophy?” Philosophy Compass 1, no. 1 (2006): 1–13.
7. Bernet, Rudolf. “Crisis in Modern and Contemporary Science.” Arhe, 2019.
8. Bhaskar, Roy. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge, 2008.
9. Borisov, E. “Analytic Philosophy.” In Philosophical Anthropology, 2021.
10. Brienza, Paul A. “Marxism in the 21st Century.” Theoria and Praxis 3 (2015).
11. Brister, Evelyn. “Value-Free Science, Policy Advocacy, and Volitional Pragmatism.” The Pluralist 10, no. 1 (2015): 23–30.
12. Chryssavgis, John. “Personhood and the Ethos of the Orthodox Church.” The Ecumenical Review 55, no. 3 (2003): 282–296.
13. Critchley, Simon. Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
14. Delacampagne, Christian, dan M. Debevoise. A History of Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
15. Donatus, Paulus T. “Neo-Kantianisme dan Implikasinya untuk Penelitian terhadap Agama.” Melintas: Jurnal Teologi dan Wacana Keagamaan 37, no. 3 (2021): 273–288.
16. Downing, Oliver George. “Surpassing Philosophical Antagonism? A Critique of Tom Eyers’s Post-Rationalism.” Philosophy Today 59 (2015): 547–553.
17. Gilson, Etienne. The Spirit of Mediaeval Philosophy. Translated by A. H. C. Downes. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991.
18. Glock, Hans-Johann. “The Rise of Analytic Philosophy.” 1999.
19. Goodman, Russell B. Pragmatism. New York: Routledge, 2020.
20. Guan, Yuying. “Comparing Neoliberalism and Neo-Marxism from an Economic Perspective.” Asian Social Science 19, no. 4 (2023): 95–105.
21. Halton, Eugene. “Pragmatic E-Pistols.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 2011.
22. Harrelson, K. “Hegel and the Modern Canon.” The Owl of Minerva 44 (2012): 1–35.
23. Hittinger, Russell. “The Recovery of Natural Law.” The Review of Politics 52, no. 3 (1990): 406–418.
24. Hosle, Vittorio. “The Search for a Foundation of the Human Sciences and the Social Sciences in Neo-Kantianism and Dilthey.” Dialogue and Universalism 28, no. 3 (2018): 19–40.
25. Humphrey, Caroline. “Marxism and Neo-Marxism.” In Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Anthropology, 79–90. London: Routledge, 2018.
26. Jasmine, Y. “Spectres of Logical Positivism.” (2011).
27. Jones, Roger B. “Positive Philosophy and the Automation of Reason.” 2012.
28. Jubara, Annett. “Mikhail Lifshits and the Fate of Hegelianism in the 20th Century.” Studies in East European Thought 68 (2016): 307–318.
29. Khan, K. “French Neo-Hegelianism in Four Acts.” History of Philosophy 26, no. 1 (2021): 139–144.
30. Kivela, Ari. “A Neo-Hegelian Theory of Bildung and the Problem of a Priori Intersubjectivism.” Journal of Philosophy of Education (2024).
31. Knasas, John F. X. “Neo-Thomism and the Modern Mind.” The Thomist 67, no. 2 (2003): 167–189.
32. Kraft, Victor. The Vienna Circle: The Origin of Neo-Positivism; a Chapter in the History of Recent Philosophy. Translated by Arthur Pap. New York: Philosophical Library, 1953.
33. Krasnodebski, Zdzisław. “The Crisis of Modernity and the Life-World.” International Sociology 5, no. 3 (1990): 247–265.
34. Marcel, Gabriel. Homo Viator: Introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
35. Mayo, Marjorie. “The Continuing Relevance of Marxism for Popular Education Today.” Theoria and Praxis 10 (2019): 9–19.
36. McInerny, Ralph. A First Glance at St. Thomas Aquinas: A Handbook for Peeping Thomists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990.
37. Meisels, Marlene V. “Philosophical and Epistemological Foundations of a Post-Structural Writing Lesson.” Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), 2019.
38. Munday, Roderick. “Zizek and the Reality of the Real.” International Journal of Zizek Studies 6, no. 1 (2012).
39. Nedoncelle, Maurice. Personalisme et existence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1942.
40. Ney, Alyssa. “Neo-Positivist Metaphysics.” Philosophical Studies 160 (2012): 53–78.
41. Norrie, Alan. “Roy Bhaskar, Critical Realism and the Limits of Law.” Journal of Critical Realism 4, no. 1 (2005): 139–163.
42. O'Hear, Anthony. What Philosophy Is: An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985.
43. Pojman, Louis P. Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
44. Priest, Graham. “Where is Philosophy at the Start of the Twenty‐First Century?” The Monist 103 (2002): 85–99.
45. Ramsey, Ian. “Contemporary Philosophy and the Christian Faith.” Religious Studies 1, no. 1 (1965): 47–61.
46. Ryle, Gilbert, ed. Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy. Stocksfield: Oriel Press, 1977.
47. Sandu, A. “Assumption of Post-Structuralism in Contemporary Epistemology.” Postmodern Openings 7 (2011): 39–52.
48. Sertler, Ezgi. “Notes from a Structural Epistemologist.” Hypatia, 2023.
49. Shvyrev, V. S. “The Neopositivist Conception of Empirical Significance, and Logical Analysis of Scientific Knowledge.” Russian Studies in Philosophy 2, no. 1 (1963): 10–20.
50. Skolimowski, H. “A Diagnosis of Contemporary Philosophy.” 2016.
51. Solodka, Olena. “Theory of Modern as a Crisis Programme of Philosophy.” Sententiae, 2023.
52. Staiti, Andrea, and Curtis Sommerlatte Warren, eds. New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
53. Stern, R. “British Hegelianism: A Non-Metaphysical View?” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 16 (1994): 17–38.
54. Stokes, Patrick. “Phenomenology and the Crisis of Contemporary Meaning.” Continental Philosophy Review 47 (2014): 1–21.
55. Vodonic, John. “Neo-Pragmatism: An Ethical Anticipatory System.” European Journal of Futures Research 5 (2017): 1–7.
56. Wati, Ratna. “Analyzing and Viewing the Development of Construction of the Philosophical View of Positivism.” Journal of World Science 3, no. 8 (2024).
57. Watson, D. “The Neo-Hegelian Tradition in America.” Journal of American Studies 14 (1980): 219–234.
58. Wendland, Z. “With What Is Twentieth-Century Philosophy Entering into the Twenty First Century?” Dialogue and Universalism, 2003.
59. West, David. Continental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
60. Williams, David. “The Relevance of Personalism Today.” The Heythrop Journal 58, no. 3 (2017): 404–418.
61. Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2000.
62. Zhang, Ru-lu. “On Modernity and Contemporary Western Philosophy.” Journal of Yunnan University, 2003.
63. Zhang, Yu-neng. “Axiology Philosophy of Neo-Kantianism and Literal Thoughts.” Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology 9, no. 4 (2008): 18–21.
64. Zykova, Iuliia A. “Christian Consciousness in the Philosophy of French Neo-Hegelianism.” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies 37, no. 1 (2021): 4–7.
Smart TV, Laptop, MS Power Point, Makalah